UnionBook

The social network for trade unionists - a LabourStart project.

Information

Strike!

A group to post information & take action about & for strikes!

Location: General
Members: 42
Latest Activity: on Saturday

Discussion Forum

The State of Georgia is Trying to Criminalize Picketing, Urgent!

You read that right. Anti-worker state lawmakers in Georgia want to criminalize our basic right to freedom of speech. They're pushing a bill to impose a $10,000 fine or a year in prison or both for…Continue

Started by Alexandria Davis Feb 28.

General Strike in North America on May 1st? 1 Reply

This is a link to a pdf of the General Strike flier released by Denver/Boulder IWW GMB for May 1st in English and Spanish. Any thoughts on this? Are there resources for this action continent-wide? We…Continue

Started by Evan Herzoff. Last reply by Alexandria Davis Feb 28.

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Strike! to add comments!

Comment by Joe Balkis on Saturday

Machinists Strike as Caterpillar
Demands Non-Union Wage Rates 

Do workers need a union to negotiate "market-based" wages? Machinists at a Caterpillar factory in Joliet, Illinois, struck May 1 to tell the heavy-equipment giant they deserve better.

Comment by Joe Balkis on Saturday

Hour Before Release, Palestinian Prisoner Sent to Admin Detention • Hunger Strike Continues

Comment by Joe Balkis on Thursday

Hi brothers and sisters,
I'm sharing an article about the solidarity rally with striking Caterpillar workers, a struggle with great implications for all workers.
In solidarity,
John Bachtell
Strikers blast Caterpillar greed, reject concessions
JOLIET, Ill. - Unabashed corporate greed, is how striking workers are describing Caterpillar's efforts to slash wages and benefits while eliminating pensions and seniority rights at their plant here.
Over 1000 striking workers, their families and supporters rallied in an impressive show of solidarity at the plant gate May 11. They were greeted by a constant blare of horns from passing trucks and motorists.
Article continues: http://www.peoplesworld.org/strikers-blast-caterpillar-greed-reject...
Caterpillar workers strike against take back contract http://peoplesworld.org/caterpillar-workers-strike-against-take-bac...

You may also be interested in the following analysis by CPUSA labor secretary and SOAR leader Scott Marshall:
Labor fightback in the Great Recession
"Ten thousand times has the labor movement stumbled and bruised itself. We have been enjoined by the courts, assaulted by thugs, charged by the militia, traduced by the press, frowned upon in public opinion, and deceived by politicians. But notwithstanding all this and all these, labor is today the most vital and potential power this planet has ever known, and its historic mission is as certain of ultimate realization as is the setting of the sun." - Eugene V. Debs
Reading this quotation today, over 100 years later, you are struck by two things. How appropriate, how up to date, and how well it fits labor's situation today. At the same time, 108 years later, you are bound to wonder, how is it that labor can be so bruised and battered yet again?
Article continues: http://peoplesworld.org/labor-fightback-in-the-great-recession/

Comment by Joe Balkis on Thursday

Palestinian Prisoners Score Heroic Victory Struggle to End Israel’s Oppression and International Complicity Continues

Israeli authorities were forced to comply with the prisoners’ demands. Coinciding with the Palestinian commemoration of the Nakba, the campaign of ethnic cleansing that uprooted most Palestinians from their homeland around 1948, the prisoners’ victory has heightened hope about the prospects for Palestinian freedom, justice, self determination and the return of refugees. This triumph for the Palestinian struggle couldn't have been reached without the resolve of the prisoners themselves, grassroots mobilization in their support in Palestine, and the wave of solidarity and calls for holding Israel accountable that the strike has triggered around the world. More than a thousand people around the globe have pledged to undertake a 24-hour hunger strike in solidarity with the prisoners.  While the solidarity hunger-strike has been called off, due to the prisoners' victory, illegal repression continue in Israeli prisons. Emphasizing imprisonment as a critical component of Israel’s system of occupation practiced against the Palestinian people, Palestinian and human rights organizations have called for intensifying the global Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign to target corporations profiting directly from the Israeli prison system. We call for action to be taken to hold to account G4S, the world’s largest international security corporation, which helps to maintain and profit from Israels prison system, for its complicity with violations of international law. Please click here to demand G4S ends its involvement in the  prison system and its complicity in violations of human rights.

Comment by Joe Balkis on Thursday

Quebec Suspends Civil Liberties in Response to the Student Strike Elizabeth Leier, Truthout: "Since the global financial meltdown of 2008, many Western countries have experienced widespread protesting and even, in some cases, rioting in the streets. This has been the year of the Occupy movement, a cry for solidarity in the face of ever-growing crony capitalism and belt tightening from governments. In Canada's francophone Province of Quebec, it is students that have mobilized this year to combat growing austerity plans and, in particular, a post-secondary tuition hike of 82 percent spread over seven years." Read the Article

Comment by Joe Balkis on May 13, 2012 at 13:16

On the 64th anniversary of Al-Nakba: there is no more time to wait, there is no more time to spare, NOW is the time for action!
https://www.facebook.com/ events/237334053037149/
WHAT: Candlelight Vigil in Support of Palestinian Political Prisoners on Hunger Strike in Israeli prisons
WHEN: Monday, May 14th, 2012             7:30 PM
WHERE: The Water Tower Park                806 N. Michigan Ave.                (corner of Chicago & Michigan Aves.)
WHY: In support of the prisoners' demands:
1. An immediate end to administrative detention, the Israeli policy of imprisoning Palestinian activists and organizers for months, and sometimes years, without any formal charges.
2. An end to the policy of solitary confinement and isolation, which have been used to deprive Palestinian prisoners of their rights for more than a decade.
3. To allow the families of prisoners from the Gaza Strip to visit. This right has been denied to all families for more than 6 years.
4. An improvement in the living conditions of prisoners and an end to the "Shalit" law, which outlaws prisoners' access to newspapers, learning materials, and many TV channels.
5. An end to the the policies of humiliation which are suffered by prisoners and their families, such as strip searches, nightly raids, and collective punishment.
The condition of the 2500+ Palestinian political prisoners on hunger strike is rapidly deteriorating.  Two of the prisoners, Bilal Diab and Thaer Halahleh, have passed their 70th day refusing food, putting them in critical condition and close to death. The people of Palestine have stood in solidarity with the strikers; on May 9th, Palestinian youth blocked the UN offices in Ramallah, demanding that the U.N. take a stand to save the lives of the striking prisoners. Take action now to support the demands of the prisoners, which are basic and all in accordance with Geneva Conventions.                                   The forces of the Israeli occupation in the prisons, known as the Israeli Prison Service, have done everything they can to crush the strike, including cutting off the inmates from their lawyers and refusing the strikers access to the medical clinic unless they end the hunger strike.  In addition to these measures, they have also instituted a system of collective punishment of strikers, which includes solitary confinement, daily fines up to 500 NIS ($131 USD),  and random body and cell searches. 
Despite all of this repression, the prisoners remain steadfast, most recently stating in their fourth official communication: “We vow to live with dignity or die.” 

Comment by Joe Balkis on March 23, 2012 at 5:36

IUF
Uniting food, farm and hotel workers world-wide

Spanish unions are united as never before in their mobilization against labour law 'reforms' which gut workplace protection and trade union rights and in defense of public services. A 24-hour national general strike has been called for March 29.
Spain's trade union movement is fighting back not only against their own government, but against the European-wide austerity drive which is transferring wealth and destroying public services on a massive scale. You can support their struggle by sending a message of support to the IUF's Spanish affiliates, telling them you are with them on March 29 and for as long as it takes for the government to change course.
Click here to send a message

For more information click here.
Ron Oswald General Secretary, IUF
International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers' Associations (IUF)
8, rampe du Pont-Rouge 1213 Petit Lancy, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 793 22 33 Fax: +41 22 793 22 38 website: www.iuf.org

Comment by Joe Balkis on March 1, 2012 at 10:03

General Strike in India vs. Privatization

From:
View contact details
To:
"Joseph Balkis" <brojoe705@yahoo.com>

See related site concerning Illinois at:  http://www.ctariders.org/Brochure.html
 
The union Public Services Internatonal opposed the “downsizing, outsourcing, contractualisation, corporatisation and privatisation of government function.” They demand protection for the right to strike, regulation of the use of “casual” labor, and measures to “Keep the public utilities in public hand.”
 
http://www.inthesetimes.com/working/entry/12813/in_general_strike_i...
 
In All-India General Strike, Workers Go All Out Against Neoliberalism


By Michelle Chen

Trade union activists participate in a rally to show support for the All India General Strike, in Siliguri on February 27, 2012. (Diptendu Dutta/AFP/Getty Images)  

 

India’s economic ascent seems like it should be the envy of the world’s richest nations; with rocketing growth rates and gargantuan consumer and labor markets, India's destiny as Asia's next superstar looks beyond a doubt. Except Indian workers just gave the boosters of global capitalism a few million second thoughts.
 
The all-India general strike of February 28 brought together workers of various sectors and political stripes, civil servants along with rickshaw drivers, united under a banner of opposition to neoliberal policies of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government. The labor movement of the world’s largest democracy issued a stark challenge to the idea of deregulation as an economic cure.
 
AFP quoted All India Trade Union Congress general secretary Gurudas Dasgupta: “We are fighting for our rights against a government that is anti-people,”
 
The core grievances center around government corruption, rising costs of living, labor violations, privatization, and the general rush to hand the economy over to the talons free enterprise and shred the welfare state.
 
Public Services International, a global union that works with public employees in India, articulated a broad agenda of social and economic protection:
 
The common demands are (a) gaining the same rights and protection for temporary and contract workers as that of permanent workers, (b) raising and extending the minimum wage, (c) resisting the attacks on trade unions, (d) stopping price rise, (e) the creation of a national social security fund, (f) increase in pensions, (g) combating corruption.
 
In addition, public sector advocates oppose the “downsizing, outsourcing, contractualisation, corporatisation and privatisation of government function.” They demand protection for the right to strike, regulation of the use of “casual” labor, and measures to “Keep the public utilities in public hand.”
 
Other rallying points of the strike include pressing the government to ratify key international labor accords and to provide social security for all workers, including the irregular laborers often subjected to exploitation, discrimination and outright slavery.
 
Since the start of India’s neoliberal reform push in 1991, the country has reportedly seen fourteen general strikes. Like the mass protests against the proposed expansion of Wal-Mart into India late last year, this general strike is an affront to a governing party that has tried to project an image of populism and now faces weakening growth rates.
 
The Indian workforce remains socially and politically stratified, and not all workers participated in the union-led strike. But for at least a little while, legions of workers aligned to put the brakes on the public and private sectors. Transit services were blockaded in some areas, and many bank employees struck to jam up the country's financial engine.
 
J. S. R. Prasad, director of India’s Union Development and Organising Centre (UNIDOC), an affiliate of UNI Global Union, told In These Times that the strike marked “a firm step in opposing the Government’s policies dealing with workers in India” and displayed unprecedented alliances. “For the first time the INTUC, the Trade Union Federation affiliated with ruling Congress party, also participated along with communist controlled Trade Union Federations in India,” he noted.
 
Still, though the general strike involved both white and blue collar workers, the country’s vast labor force is awash with unregulated, unorganized laborers relegated to the shadows of the economy, lacking even the most basic regulatory protections. As long as this cheap labor pool fuels India’s explosive “development,” all workers will spiral deeper into a capitalist freefall, accelerated by policies aimed at luring in the vultures of foreign investment.
 
In a recent analysis of labor issues in India, the International Trade Union Confederation reported that many of the most oppressed workers are children, who “can be found in a wide variety of industries, sometimes undertaking hazardous tasks, including in mining and quarrying, textiles, leather and garment factories, fireworks factories and many others.” In general, according to the report, “forced labour is a problem in agriculture, mining, commercial sexual exploitation, and other sectors. Overall law enforcement is poor and judicial capacities are not effective in addressing the problem.”
 
Yet even in mainstream sectors, the free-market development agenda is steamrolling workers’ rights. A report issued by PSI’s India Office describes how India's “new economic policy,” which embodied the free-market ideology that has shaped "development" across the Global South, has systematically eroded the economic security of government workers:
 
The system of outsourcing, contractualisation and casualisation of workforce started in 1993-94. During 1995 the total number of permanent central government employees was 3.98 million whereas in 2008 it came down to 3.11 million. Nearly 22% of permanent jobs were lost, which were replaced by casual workers including on jobs of permanent nature.
 
Though the general strike suggests that labor groups are being galvanized by shared economic struggles, Prasad said that “division among working class” is still a major impediment to organizing that “loosens their united strength and bargaining power.  This is where the government and managements take full advantage and deny their legitimate demands.”
 
The destruction of workers’ collective power is an old story. India’s path to modernization is trailed by long historical threads of imperialism, from the first waves of colonization to the current tides of neoliberalism and political profiteering. Yet as a response to those inequalities, the general strike reveals a common battlefront emerging for all workers, from child factory workers to bank clerks, all facing a global assault on human rights.
Comment by Joe Balkis on February 22, 2012 at 6:37

SEATTLE PORT STRIKE CHALLENGES "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR" LIE
Truck drivers in the Puget Sound shut down ports for two weeks-and
begin to shift the balance of power.

By David Bacon

In These Times, Website edition, 2/21/12
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/12775/seattle_port_strike_challe
nges_independent_contractor_lie

/Abdulkader Ali asks a driver to join the strike./

SEATTLE-Employers say they're "independent contractors." Drivers call
that a legal trick to deny them their rights-a nice-sounding label
obscuring an ugly reality.

For two weeks in February, this argument raged at terminal gates in
the ports of Seattle and Tacoma. Hundreds of truckers, who normally
ferry huge shipping containers from dockside to waiting trains and
warehouses, refused to get behind the wheel and drive. Instead, they
caravanned to the terminal gates and appealed to their coworkers to
climb out of their cabs and join their strike.

Port managers claimed that it was business as usual on the docks.
Standing in front of the BNSF rail yard, though, the strikers could
see stacks of containers that weren't going anywhere. When they
wouldn't drive, the "cans," as they're called, stacked up on ships, in
rail yards, and at warehouses. The port's lifeblood slowed to a crawl.
Cargo has to move for shippers and trucking companies to make money. A
still container, a waiting ship and an idle truck all mean lost
profits. It was clear the strike was costing employers a lot of money.

Finally, after the standoff had gone on for two weeks, on February 14
the two sides basically declared a truce, and drivers went back to
work. In their eyes, however, it was only a step, not yet an agreement
that resolved their problems. They had made their point, however, by
showing the trucking companies they work for-and the huge shipping
corporations behind them-that drivers have power over the movement of
cargo. And they could and would use it to bring about the changes they
demanded.

The truckers came away from the strike better organized than they'd
ever been before. Every morning they'd gather at the Teamsters Union
hall in Tukwila before heading to the docks. Then, in the evening
they'd return. The hall would fill with drivers in intense
conversations in Amharic, Somali, Urdu and English as they repeated
their demands and decided on tactics for the following day. After two
weeks, a hardened core of 400 were veterans of the flying squads,
deployed in winter rainstorms from gate to gate. They had testified in
hearings and spoken to reporters.

In the end, many agreed their most important achievement was the
organization that emerged strengthened from the strike: the Seattle
Port Truckers Association.

/One driver signals his support for the strike./

Ultimately, the drivers want a change in their status, as does the
union helping them, the Teamsters. "We want to be considered
employees," said striker Burhan Abdi, by which he meant that the
companies should assume real responsibility for the conditions they
impose.

While the containers with the cargo and the trailers that carry them
belong to the shipping companies, the tractors-that is, the engines
and cabs that pull the trailers-belong to the drivers. In theory. In
reality, ownership is a not-so-polite fiction.

To drive for the trucking companies, the workers have to lease them
their trucks. "But when I need to use the truck for some other
purpose, it's not mine," explained Abdi. "It's the company's. It looks
like I own it, but that's not real. It's my truck but it's not my
truck." Abdi said that if he even used it to move his family's
furniture to a new apartment, the company would fire him for it.

That's just one reason truckers refused to haul loads for two weeks.
Since the deregulation of the trucking industry in the 1970s, the
fiction of ownership has been the lever the companies use to dictate
conditions and prevent bargaining over them. Trucking companies pay a
set amount for each load a driver hauls-usually between $40 and $48.
Out of that, drivers have to pay all the costs of running their
rigs-the gas, the repairs and maintenance. The trucking companies in
turn get paid by the huge corporations that own the ships, railroads,
container cranes and terminals.

Drivers often have to wait in long lines to pick up a load. Dozens of
cabs and empty trailers stand with their big diesels running. The air
turns thick and acrid from their blue smoke. In the distance, huge
ships are pulled up next to the docks, containers stacked so high on
their decks they seem like tall buildings. Enormous cranes stack and
unstack the cans, moving them like toys from dock to ship and back.

One driver described his life: "In order to get a load, you have to
get up early, at four o'clock in the morning. You pull yourself up
into the cab of your truck while you're still half-awake - you don't
even see your family before you leave. Then you go down to the harbor
and get into the lines. And you wait. Finally, you get to the head of
the line, and you get a container. Then you're on the freeway, making
time as fast as you can, to deliver it to the customer. When you get
there, you usually have to wait to unload as well, before you go back
down to the harbor for another pick up. No one pays you for all those
hours of waiting."

"When we stay at a terminal we don't get paid," said another driver,
Michael Kidane, who drives for Pacer Cartage. "When we haul heavy
loads or reefers (refrigerated containers), we don't get paid for
that. When we return a chassis, we don't get paid. The company gets
paid for all this, but we don't."

Often the trailers are in poor condition, and drivers can be cited if
their brakes don't work properly. Cans are stuffed so full they weigh
more than the legal limits. Starbucks, for instance, according to
drivers, is well known for overweight containers. If they take on the
load and later are stopped by the Highway Patrol, they're fined for
excessive weight. Drivers, not companies, have to pay the fines, and
if they get too many tickets, they can lose their licenses. But if
they refuse the loads, the employers will punish them by denying them
work for a few days.

One of the strike's demands, Kidane noted, was that companies should
give them copies of the cargo manifests for the containers. They show
how much the cans weigh, and even more important, how much the
companies get for hauling them. Unsurprisingly, this was a demand the
trucking firms resisted strongly.

*'Babies' and 'monkeys'

*Companies charge drivers $120 a week for liability insurance, even
though the freight is already insured by the shippers. Sometimes a
driver gets sick or there's not enough work, and the rig sits idle.
Then drivers get the symbol they detest the most, that more than any
other inspired their strike: the negative paycheck. Their employers
hand them a check with a $120 charge they'll deduct from future
earnings, for a week when the truck never moved. Drivers doubt that
the companies actually spend that $120 on insurance, and instead
believe they pocket most of it.

/Burhan Abdi hold one of the notorious negative paychecks./

"They are making $120 each week, $480 per month, times 50 trucks,"
calculated striker Jaswinder Singh about his own employer. "There
they're ripping off our money. They are robbing us, robbing us."

Sometimes, drivers said, the companies let them know their position
in graphic language. According to Kidane, when truckers ask about the
weight of their loads at his company, the dispatcher calls them
babies. "I'm 37 years old, and she calls me a baby," he fumed. "One of
my coworkers is over 50, and he's a baby too. A baby cannot drive a
truck. A baby cannot get a license. I should get an award or
something, instead of being called a baby."

In another company, drivers heard themselves referred to on the radio
as monkeys. "There are white drivers, black drivers, Indians, Chinese,
and Africans. They call all of us a bunch of monkeys," said Abdulkadir
Ali, as he held aloft a sign saying "Respect Drivers' Rights!"

In every Pacific coast port, most drivers are immigrants. Seattle and
Tacoma's truckers are mostly East African, from Ethiopia, Eritrea,
Somalia and Kenya, along with Sikhs from the Punjab region of India.
As immigrants, drivers often feel vulnerable. Abdi explained that they
have to learn quickly to confront racism in the U.S. in a way they
didn't have to in Africa.

"We are mostly immigrants and mostly blacks," he said. "I come from
Somalia. Nobody even knows the word discrimination back there. But
over here, I see discrimination when something wrong is happening. And
everything wrong is happening in the Port of Seattle. We may come from
countries far away, but we still have rights."

About 100 Sikhs, who make up 10 percent of the workforce, met at
their local church to talk about whether or not to join the strike.
"We understand," Jaswinder Singh recounted, "and we are not scared."
The Sikh's memory of their own history, he explained, helped them
understand the issues in their conflict with the companies. "We come
from India, and we fought there against the British and kicked them
out. We are fighting for the same thing here-integrity and simple
respect and fairness. We believe in democracy, and we will fight
peacefully, the right way. But we will fight to the last breath."

/Jaswinder Singh talks with drivers in the hall after a day striking
at the terminals./

The federal government says harbor truckers, and millions of workers
like them, cannot join a union. They may look, think, talk and work
like workers, but the government tells them they are not workers at
all-they are "independent contractors."

That status is a product of the deregulation of the trucking
industry. In 1973, the federal government began pulling apart the web
of rules that had set prices for transporting goods from one point to
another, and had provided minimum safety standards for drivers. That
process was completed when President Carter signed the Motor Carrier
Act of 1980. In the following era of cutthroat competition, trucking
companies cut their costs to the bone. The most common method used to
pare expenses was getting rid of drivers. Company after company laid
off men and women who had been employees for years. Then they offered
to pay a driver with his or her own truck a set amount of money to
carry a load.

Old-timers remember that the companies had big lots full of used
trucks, and sold them to the same people who'd been their employees.
Once drivers got loans and bought rigs, though, they drove for the
bank. From then on, all the expenses were theirs-gas, insurance, loan
payment, repairs-everything.

Federal deregulation of the trucking industry essentially put drivers
on a piece rate. For the companies, it was a good deal-they could pay
by the load without assuming any of the risks. They no longer had to
pay workers compensation, disability or unemployment insurance
premiums for the drivers. If taxes or the price of gas went up,
drivers had to absorb it. If a truck broke down, it wasn't the
company's concern.

Freed of these costs, company profits went up. But truckers say as a
result, their income dropped. Median income for Seattle drivers is now
$28,500 per year, for an average workweek of 60 hours, but strikers on
the picket line said they make as little as $15-20,000. Meanwhile, a
union hourly wage in the trucking industry can reach $60,000 annually.

/Striker Siefe Biru holds up a sign in Amharic, spoken by Ethiopians,
urging drivers to join the strike./

*West coast preludes

*Long before the strike in Seattle, drivers tried to change
conditions, especially in North America's largest port, Los
Angeles/Long Beach. In the summer and fall of 1984, drivers unhappy
over declining conditions spontaneously struck and shut down the
harbor. In the strike's aftermath, they tried to set up a cooperative,
but it failed. After trucking companies refused to improve conditions,
drivers struck again in 1988 for six weeks. Rising gas prices led to a
national wildcat movement in 1993, as owner-operators refused to pick
up loads until trucking companies absorbed part of the increased cost.

On Terminal Island, between San Pedro and Long Beach harbors, police
drove strikers from their lines with tear gas and rubber bullets, and
forced them back to work. In January 1994, Los Angeles port drivers
organized the Latin American Truckers Association, and in 1996 they
struck for two weeks with the Communication Workers union. They lost
that one as well.

Over the last decade, the Teamsters union, environmentalists and
drivers in many ports organized the Coalition for Clean and Safe
Ports. Near the Seattle port, in the immediate adjacent neighborhoods
of South Park and Georgetown, the EPA has found that cancer risk is 27
times higher than the national average. An estimated 95 percent of the
nation's 110,000 port trucks fail to meet current U.S. EPA emission
standards. To reduce the health dangers of the smoke from the long
lines of waiting trucks to workers and residents, the coalition has
proposed local ordinances. They would make the drivers direct
employees of the companies they work for, and set up a dispatch system
that wouldn't require them to wait so long in line for loads.

The trucking companies have challenged all the ordinances and legal
battles continue over them. In January in Washington State, the
legislature debated a bill that would hold the companies responsible
for overweight loads or unsafe trailers, and another that would
reinstate the employee status of port truckers. The Washington
Trucking Association and the Washington Public Ports Association
testified against them both.

*The beginning of a new balance of power

*When one came up for debate on January 30, however, more than 100
drivers took off work and showed up in Olympia (the capital) to
support it. Many of those who testified were threatened. After one
driver, Yared Maconnen, was fired at Western Ports Transportation, the
other drivers in his company walked off the job. The strike soon
spread to other companies. Work stopped at major outfits like Seattle
Freight Service Inc., Pacer Cartage, Western Ports Transportation
Inc., Edgmon Trucking, Elliott Bay Service Transfer and PCC Logistics.
As the strike progressed through demonstrations at the terminal gates
and in meetings at the Teamsters Hall in Tukwila, it gave real power
to the Seattle Port Truckers Association.

On February 13, drivers and supporters mounted a big rally in the
Seattle port. With the help of Local 19 of the International Longshore
and Warehouse Union-the workers who run the cranes and load and unload
the ships-the drivers met with the port director and representatives
of the trucking companies. The following day they agreed to continue
talking, a de facto recognition of the power of the truckers'
organization, and drivers went back to work.

As they climbed back into their cabs, some companies offered to
increase the price per load by $4 if drivers have to wait more than an
hour in line, and to pay for some trips taken without loads. Most of
the original demands of the strike are still unresolved, but the
balance of power in the port is shifting. Drivers who strike once can
obviously do so again.

A similar shift may also be taking place in the tactics of the
Teamsters union itself. The effort to win local and state ordinances
requiring the companies to restore employee status will undoubtedly
continue. But legislative efforts may now be combined with direct
pressure in the terminals themselves, by drivers who undertake their
own independent action to force immediate changes in conditions.

Seattle and Tacoma are no backwaters. Together they make up the third
larges container port in North America, moving 1,700,000 cans a year.
What happens on these Northwest docks will be felt in other ports as
well, especially if drivers there adopt a similar strategy.

Whether in Seattle, Oakland or Los Angeles, the drivers' problems are
the same. And the companies they "contract" for are too.

"We are considered like containers, thrown out after we're used,"
Kidane declared bitterly. "But I'm a human being, and I want them to
see me and treat me like a human being."

/Striker Michael Kidane./

For more articles and images, see http://dbacon.igc.org
a href="http://dbacon.igc.org/" target="_blank">http://dbacon.igc.org/>

See also Illegal People -- How Globalization Creates Migration and
Criminalizes Immigrants (Beacon Press, 2008)
Recipient: C.L.R. James Award, best book of 2007-2008
http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?PC=2002

See also the photodocumentary on indigenous migration to the US
Communities Without Borders (Cornell University/ILR Press, 2006)
http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_detail.taf?ti_id=4575

See also The Children of NAFTA, Labor Wars on the U.S./Mexico Border
(University of California, 2004)
http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/9989.html

--

__________________________________

David Bacon, Photographs and Stories

http://dbacon.igc.org a href="http://dbacon.igc.org/" target="_blank">http://dbacon.igc.org/>

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 14, 2012 at 7:03

Analysis: Darrin Hoop
HIGH STAKES IN SEATTLE PORT DRIVERS' STRIKE
Hundreds of nonunion port truck drivers in Seattle have been on strike for two weeks over issues ranging from workplace safety to the right to organize.
http://socialistworker.org/2012/02/13/high-stakes-for-seattle-port-drivers

 

Members (42)

 
 
 

© 2012   Created by Eric Lee.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service