The social network for trade unionists - a LabourStart project.


Solidarity 69

The purpose of this group is to create solidarity among the left & to take action by any means necessary.

Location: The frontline is everywhere!
Members: 75
Latest Activity: on Tuesday

Discussion Forum

How to Promote Solidarity? 1 Reply

I think this group is a great idea and a worthy goal, but the question is how do we achieve this or at least how do we take practical steps to it?I know of many different attempts to unify various…Continue

Started by Rhys Harrison. Last reply by Joe Balkis Sep 30, 2012.

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Solidarity 69 to add comments!

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 28, 2012 at 19:02
Please Forward:  Even if you are not in Chicago there is probably an Occupation near you and an Event against the suppression. 

Stop the Suppression
of the Occupy Movement!
Tuesday, Feb. 28, 4pm rally - 5pm march
Gather at LaSalle & Jackson

It's completely unacceptable that police can carry out mass arrests and evict people from public squares simply for asking questions about why this society is organized in such an unjust and unequal
Stand with the Occupy Movement!  
No Rubber Bullets-No Beatings-No Tear Gas-No Mass Arrests  
Drop All the Charges Against Occupiers
Overturn Rahm Emmanuel's "sit down & shut up" ordinances
 Occupy Chicago General Assembly as well as Occupy Wall Street, Cleveland, Houston, Hollywood and St. Paul & Minneapolis have endorsed the  Call for Mass Action Against  the Suppression of the Occupy Movement and are organizing protests on Feb. 28. Chicago Feb. 28 action  is endorsed by Occupy Chicago, Midwest Anti-War Mobilization, Coalition against Nato/G8, Chicago Code PINK and Chicago World Can't Wait. Go to face book event to get connected.                               
Feb. 28 needs to begin to mobilize all those who have been inspired by Occupy and who see the injustice, and terrible consequences, of it being squelched. Feb. 28 actions are an important step in opposing the severe clampdown being put in place for the G8 and NATO summits. We have to set the record straight in society that the repression against Occupy over recent months was unlawful and completely intolerable. Otherwise it will be much more difficult for the voices of the 99% to be expressed in the streets when the global 1% descends on Chicago in May. 
 What you can do:
1. Organize your schools, community groups, churches, and unions to endorse the Call and come out on Feb. 28 with signs, banners, drums, and energy!
2.  Widely distribute "A Call for Mass Action Against the Suppression of the Occupy Movement" on the Internet and by leaflet (download at dontsuppressows. org)
3.  Connect with Feb 28 working group. Write to Feb28wg@gmail. com with ideas.  
From the Call for Mass Action Against  the Suppression of the Occupy Movement:    
To put the matter bluntly, but truly: the state planned and unleashed naked and systematic violence and repression against people attempting to exercise rights that are supposed to be legally guaranteed. This response by those who wield power in this society is utterly shameful from a moral standpoint, and thoroughly illegitimate from a legal and political one.Now this movement faces a true crossroads. Will it be dispersed, driven into the margins, or co-opted? Or will it come back stronger? This question now poses itself, extremely sharply



A campus where free speech is banned

February 28, 2012

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A case currently before a federal appeals court will test the limits of previous court rulings that have been used to virtually eliminate free speech for faculty at public colleges and universities.
The case, Capeheart v. NEIU et al., stems from the Northeastern Illinois University administration's attack on Professor Loretta Capeheart for her role in advising a student group involved in antiwar activities. The university retaliated against her by denying her the department chair post she had been elected to fill. Then administrators sought to destroy Capeheart's credibility by launching a slander campaign against her.
This frontal attack on free speech would be chilling enough if it were confined to NEIU's Chicago campus. But NEIU based its defense on the U.S. Supreme Court Garcetti decision that guts the free speech rights of all public employees--even though faculty are supposed to be excluded from that ruling [1]. A federal court agreed with the university and dismissed Capeheart's suit, prompting her to appeal.
The appeals court is expected to rule on Capeheart's case as early as April. Meanwhile, her fight is being taken up by a growing number of academics, students and free speech advocates. Capeheart gave a speech on her struggle at a February 17 meeting of the Chicago Coalition Against the Corporatization of Higher Education (CACHE). This is an edited version of her presentation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

IN FEBRUARY 2007, the same month that current President Sharon Hahs arrived at Northeastern Illinois University (NEIU), two students were arrested while peacefully protesting against CIA recruitment on campus. Various struggles for free speech and faculty governance have ensued. One such struggle is the subject of a federal lawsuit, Capeheart v. NEIU et al.

This suit was filed in response to slanderous accusations made against me during a campus meeting to discuss the arrest of those students. Then, NEIU Vice President Melvin Terrell claimed that I was being investigated by campus police for stalking a student.

There is no truth to this statement. I attempted to have the statement withdrawn and to have the VP issue an apology. Stalking is a felony sex crime and a serious allegation. When made against a professor, the accusation alone is damning.

Not only would the administration not retract the statement or offer an apology, I found that my career was in jeopardy. I was retaliated against in several ways, including not being appointed to chair my department after being elected to do so.

However, I was not alone in suffering for my speech. "Faculty expressed fear of losing their jobs or of diminished chances of retention or promotion if they were to voice their feelings" was one conclusion of the NEIU faculty senate input report in 2010. The Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) found that NEIU scored significantly below other institutions with only 7.5 percent of faculty agreeing that "administrators consider faculty concerns with making policy."

These findings are especially troubling when one considers NEIU. We are a highly diverse working class campus and one of the least expensive in the state of Illinois. NEIU is exactly the sort of place where those of us accustomed to being silenced gather in hopes of having access to the open debates that one expects at a university.

Rather than embrace free speech, the administration at NEIU prefers spending its students' hard-earned tuition dollars to quash free speech. Since Capeheart v. NEIU et al. was filed in 2008, years and an estimated hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent to keep the case from court.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE NEIU administration is relying on the U.S. Supreme Court's 2006 Garcetti v. Ceballos decision, which found that an employee of a sheriff's office was not within his rights when he criticized practices in his workplace. The decision states that an employee engaged in his or her duties does not have free speech protection.

This in itself is disturbing. But the Supreme Court did recognize the unique position of faculty and noted that the decision should not be applied to us. However, Garcetti was used to dismiss my case in federal court.

We have appealed this dismissal to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A decision on the federal appeal is expected around April of this year. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) provided an amicus brief for the appeal in which it wrote that the judge's ruling "is chilling and clear: university administrators need not tolerate outspoken faculty dissent on matters of broad public concern or on the university's institutional response to those concerns."

This is why the Supreme Court found that Garcetti should not be applied to faculty. It is often our duty to speak on issues of public and institutional concern. How do we carry out our duties if we have no protection of our speech? It seems the only answer in the administrations world is: you can speak as long as you agree, otherwise, shut up.

A recent news report [2] exposed that two former vice presidents at NEIU are "double dipping" by taking six-figure retirement incomes at the same time that they continue to work at NEIU, earning six figures here as well.

Will faculty be allowed to speak against this perceived abuse of the retirement system, student resources and state dollars? Or will the university claim that such speech is our "official duty" and therefore punishable?

The university is spending untold dollars to assure that they can impose the latter. Don't question, don't engage, just agree. We must fight these abuses and take back our rights to speak.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

What you can do

Sign the petition [3] in support of Professor Capeheart and send statements of support from your faculty organization, student group or union tojustice4loretta@gmail.com [4].


Comment by Joe Balkis on February 28, 2012 at 7:15

Interview with Joe Iosbaker

By Staff

Fight Back! interviews Joe Iosbaker, the Chicago spokesperson for the United Antiwar Coalition, on the protest that will coincide with the NATO/G8 Summit that is scheduled for May 19.

Fight Back!: Could you tell us about the protest planned for May 19?

Joe Iosbaker: In May, NATO and the G8 will meet in Chicago. NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is the military alliance of the U.S. and its European allies. The G8 (Group of Eight) is a forum of the wealthiest countries in the world - Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

They meet on behalf of the 1% of the world, the rich and the powerful, the bankers and generals. Their agenda is to continue to impose austerity, or poverty, by cutting social spending for workers and the poor to maintain profitability for the rich and to launch more wars, such as Afghanistan and Libya, to stop the rise of the poor nations of the Third World.

Saturday, May 19 is the first day of their summits. At noon that day, the largest, most powerful protest against their wars and attacks on people will take place. Tens of thousands of people from Chicago, across the country and around the world will march to within sight and sound of the war makers.

When we march, the front banner will read: Jobs, Healthcare, Education, Pensions, Housing and the Environment, Not War!

Fight Back!: Who is supporting the protest?

Iosbaker: The Coalition Against NATO/G8 War & Poverty Agenda (CANG8) was initiated last summer by the United National Antiwar Coalition. It is a broad formation that includes labor unions, community groups, anti-war and international solidarity groups and faith based activists. One of the most prominent Muslim leaders in the country, Malik Mujahid of the Muslim Peace Coalition, spoke at the founding conference of CANG8, and said that the people who would organize such a march were, “… the hope of humanity.”

No doubt, most of the people who march on May 19 will be from Chicago and the Chicago-land area. At every meeting and event we have held since we started planning this, we have had local representatives of the immigrant rights movement, African American community groups, folks fighting against home foreclosures and leaders from the Chicago Teachers Union fighting to defend against attacks on their students, their schools and their jobs. Alejandro Molina of the National Boricua Human Rights Network was a founding member of CANG8 and has spoken of hundreds of youth from the Puerto Rican community learning about NATO and the G8 and then marching with us on May 19.

CANG8 got a boost at our founding conference from the movement to oppose FBI and grand jury repression. Many of those who came to the founding conference were from the Committee to Stop FBI Repression, formed to support activists like myself and my wife, Stephanie Weiner, whose home was raided by the FBI in 2010. The anti-war and international solidarity activists targeted by this witch hunt, including Carlos Montes of Los Angeles, will join the march on May 19 as well.

Fight Back!: You have been waging a battle with city government to get permits. Could you tell us about that?

Iosbaker: Since the summer, CANG8 took the lead fighting for permits for our May 19 rally in Daley Plaza in Chicago’s center, known as The Loop. We also demanded the right to march to McCormick Place, the meeting place of NATO and the G8. We made it clear that our march would be a family friendly event.

From the outset, the city responded with threats of mass arrests of protestors. The mayor, Chicago Police Department and the Secret Service delivered the message to the media and held secret meetings with every downtown college, church, cultural institution and business group saying the protests will lead to violence. After months of this fear mongering, the Chicago Chamber of Commerce urged downtown businesses to board up their stores and hire private security. The Secret Service announced that there would be snipers on the roofs of downtown office buildings.

As we pressed our demands, in November the city responded that there would be no permits granted for any protest during the summits. We were able to gather more support from our allies, including unions like SEIU Local 73, the United Electrical workers, and the Teachers Union, plus the union and community coalition, Stand Up Chicago; a petition signed by dozens of Christian and Islamic ministers; and the Occupy Chicago movement.

Then, in January, Mayor Emanuel responded to public opinion, which clearly supported our right to protest. The city granted permits to us for our rally and march directly to the site of the summits.

In the same breath that we were given our permits, however, we were told that the Secret Service could revoke them under the needs of this National Special Security Event. Our response is to continue to demand that Mayor Emanuel and Police Superintendent McCarthy cease talking about expected violence and mass arrests and we now have to also demand that the Obama administration and Janet Napolitano, Director of Homeland Security, which is over the Secret Service, leave our permits alone.

Fight Back!: What effect will the call from the occupy movement to come to Chicago have on the protest?

Iosbaker: When CANG8 met in August, we knew that the majority of the people in the U.S. were being hurt by the attacks coming down in the economic crisis, the bailouts for the rich and cutbacks for the rest of us. We knew that war is not in the interest of working people here, that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Arabs and Muslims, and thousands of working class youth from the U.S. only benefited the same rich class that is attacking us. We predicted that when the people of Chicago learned about NATO and the G8, a gathering of all the bankers and all the war makers, they would march in their thousands and tens of thousands.

Two weeks after our conference, Occupy Wall Street began, and the movement against the 1% appeared to confirm our beliefs.

Occupy Chicago has faced repression by the same mayor who has threatened and vilified CANG8 and attempted to deny us permits. In October, Emanuel denied the Occupiers a park to camp in, arresting over 300 to punish them for participating in those protests.

Since then, Occupy Chicago and CANG8 have been working in close collaboration. We occupied city hall to demand encampment space for them and permits for May 19.
Then, Emanuel went further still, introducing ordinances in December to greatly restrict the right to protest, rewriting the current city language for permits for rallies and marches. Dubbed by Occupy Chicago, the “Sit Down and Shut Up” ordinances, the most egregious restrictions included the doubling of fines for arrests in protests; multiplying by 20 the fines for march permit violations; requiring marches and rallies to register all amplification and requiring that those applying for parade permits during the summits provide detailed information about the signs they planned to carry.

At first, aldermen and the media all agreed that no one would oppose Emanuel on this. But then, a major civil liberties fight erupted. In a joint statement published by CANG8 and Occupy Chicago on Jan. 18, we wrote:

“In response to the mayor's attack on civil liberties, the Coalition Against NATO/G8 War & Poverty Agenda (CANG8) joined together with Occupy Chicago and several unions to unite our efforts to defend civil liberties in Chicago. By last week, aldermen had felt so much pressure from constituents that they had to speak out.

“Emanuel then moved to withdraw first one, and then another, of the most criticized pieces. Protests continued to grow; Emanuel retreated further; the protests mounted and he retreated even further.

“Finally, a version was reached that the council opposition could vote for, hoping that the movement would not condemn them. The final version is still a significant attack on democratic rights; its passage is a defeat for our movement.

The mayor has not achieved his true objective, though. Emanuel looks at the new Chicago he has inherited, with protestors in so many places and he wants to put the genie back in the bottle. It’s not possible.”

Through this struggle, CANG8 and Occupy Chicago have become united in a common effort to protest the NATO/G8 summits.

Then last month, Adbusters published their call for the Occupy Movement to come to Chicago starting on May 1. We took this announcement as another confirmation that the protests in Chicago were going to become a national focus for the movement. Since then, hardly a day has gone by that we haven’t heard news of another town or college campus where people are making plans to come to stand with us.

Fight Back!: Any other points you want to make?

Iosbaker: Last year, the resistance to the unbridled attacks on working people in this country began in Madison, Wisconsin with the protests by the public employees for their right to unionization; the movement surged into a national movement when Occupy Wall Street emerged in New York in September and then that movement swept the country.

On May 19, Chicago will take our place among those centers of struggle when we unfurl our banners: “Jobs, Healthcare, Education, Pensions, Housing and the Environment, Not War! No to NATO/G-8 Warmakers! No to War and Austerity!”

Read more News and Views from the Peoples Struggle at http://www.fightbacknews.org. You can write to us at info@fightbacknews.org

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 28, 2012 at 7:13
Take action!
Clicking here will automatically add your name to this petition to President Obama:
"The new financial crimes task force you announced in the State of ...
Automatically add your name:
Take action now!

Learn more about this campaign

CREDO Action | more than a network, a movement.

55 investigators aren't nearly enough to launch a real investigation into Wall Street's crimes.

A month ago, President Obama announced during the State of the Union speech the creation of a new financial crimes task force to investigate the crimes and misdeeds that led to the economic collapse and "hold accountable those who broke the law."

Yet, despite the enormity of the issue, its direct impact on millions of Americans and the widespread nature of crimes and wrongdoing, the new financial crime unit has been given a paltry 55 staff members to undertake this enormous task.1

This contrasts to the approximately 1,000 FBI agents and dozens of federal prosecutors who were assigned to prosecute cases related to the much smaller savings and loan scandal of the '80s2, or the 100 FBI agents tasked with investigating the Enron scandal3, which involved just one company and caused none of the economy-wide damage we've seen since the collapse of the housing bubble.

Tell President Obama: 55 investigators are not enough. We need 20 t...

President Obama's record on Wall Street accountability is abysmal. But because of enormous grassroots pressure from activists like you and polling that suggests he needs to take on Wall Street as a part of his election campaign, we have a real opportunity to move President Obama to meaningful action on Wall Street accountability.

President Obama's first task force at the Department of Justice did little if anything to prosecute Wall Street for crimes that led to the financial crisis. But because of your activism, he announced a new task force and named progressive champion and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman one of its five co-chairs.

Now we need to pressure the White House to give that task force the resources it needs to pursue justice. Without sufficient staff to conduct thorough investigations, it's hard to see how this task force could bring indictments quickly.

Tell President Obama: 55 investigators are not enough. We need 20 t...

The economic crisis we're in demands a response commensurate with the damage done by Wall Street crooks. But 55 investigators don't even come close to being adequate.

And aside from the appointment of Attorney General Schneiderman, none of the other co-chairs of the new task force has done literally anything that achieves our goal of holding banks accountable or prosecuting bankers for criminal activity.

In fact, three of his co-chairs served on the earlier failed Department of Justice task force that the new investigation was created to supersede.

In an election year when we know the Obama reelection campaign wants to run against Wall Street, President Obama will be particularly sensitive to public perception of whether his efforts to hold Wall Street accountable are meaningful and represent the full force of his office.

But we only have until election day before we lose our leverage. We have until then to ensure that President Obama's gestures towards Wall Street accountability are more than mere sleight of hand that does more to protect Wall Street than to bring justice for the millions of American taxpayers who bailed out the big banks but still haven't seen any accountability for the financial fraud that led to the economic collapse.

Tell President Obama: 55 investigators are not enough. We need 20 t...

We want, and our country needs, indictments. The collapse of the housing led directly to the economic crisis we're in. But not one of the Wall Street crooks who drove our economy off a cliff has gone to jail. And without aggressive investigations and prosecution for misconduct, none of them will.

President Obama needs to give the Department of Justice task force the resources required to launch a serious investigation that will bring about real accountability before the statutes of limitations run out for Wall Street's crimes.

He can start by staffing the task force at a bare minimum at the levels of previous financial task forces created to address much smaller scandals.

It's been a month already. We can't waste any more time.

Tell President Obama: 55 investigators are not enough. We need 20 times more staffing to launch a real investigation into Wall Street's crimes. Click the link below to automatically sign the petition:


Thank youfor standing up for Wall Street accountability.

Matt Lockshin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets

1. "Details Emerge of New Financial Fraud Unit ," Huffington Post, 01-26-12.
2. FBI Deputy Director John S. Pistole's statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 02-11-09
3. "In Past Financial Crises, Fewer Pursued In Courts," NPR, 08-14-11.




Tweet this
Post to Twitter

© 2012 CREDO. All rights reserved.


Comment by Joe Balkis on February 26, 2012 at 4:36
Labor Notes Logo

UE Occupies Chicago Window Plant Again, and Wins Reprieve   

Members of the United Electrical Workers won another reprieve for a Chicago window factory, re-occupying the plant they famously held in 2008. UE took over the plant yesterday after local management said it would close immediately.  

Michigan Unions Look to Amend Constitution to Block Anti-Labor Bills

Michigan's top union leaders are deciding whether to attempt to amend the state constitution to block emergency managers and a "right to work" law through a ballot initiative this November.

Sign Up Now and Save!
Labor Notes Conference May 4-6

The next Labor Notes national conference will be held May 4-6 at the Crowne Plaza O'Hare in Chicago.

Sign up for the conference now and save: Early-bird registration is just $95. Ends March 2! Come participate in discussions about: 

Going on Offense. Targeting corporate handouts, pushing new taxes aimed at banks and other scofflaws, and bird-dogging financiers and the politicians who love them, many unions are putting the 1% in the crosshairs.
The Short-Strike Strategy. Several unions have emphasized limited strikes as part of their bargaining strategy. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the tactic?


These are just two of nearly 100 sessions in planning. Don't delay:...  

A Shallow Victory on Living Wages
In New York City 

After New York's retail union announced a living wage deal with the city council, activists greeted the news with mixed feelings. Only a small number of workers will be affected, but activists think the campaign helped change the conversation on low wages.

Chicago Occupation Challenges Corporate School Agenda    

Parents raised the stakes in the battle over the corporate takeover of education when they occupied a Chicago school last Friday. They didn't reverse the school board's "turnaround," but they did crack a wall of silence from city leaders.

Unions Rally to Protect
Contraceptive Coverage    

While Catholic bishops are organizing to get religious-affiliated institutions exempted from providing contraceptive coverage, some unions and women's organizations are counter-mobilizing

Help Us Blow Out the Candles
Hard to believe, but a scrappy rank-and-file magazine and organizing institute turns 33 this week. Founded in 1979 to bring together leaders from an inspiring string of wildcat strikes and union reform caucuses, Labor Notes is still going strong.

Keep up the momentum by helping Labor Notes grow with your tax-deductible donation today. 
In This Email
UE Occupies Chicago Window Plant Again
Michigan Unions Plot 'Right to Work' Defense
Tackle Big Issues at Labor Notes Conference
Shallow Victory in NYC Living Wage Deal
School Occupation Challenges Ed Agenda
Unions Rally to Protect Contraception
Find us on Facebook

Subscribe Today!
Labor Notes gives you a ringside seat for the ups and downs in today's labor movement. This month's issue features many additional stories, most of them not yet available online. Why not subscribe and see what you're missing?

Subscribe today! 
Quick Links
Join Our Email List!
Labor Notes | 7435 Michigan Ave | Detroit | MI | 48210
Comment by Joe Balkis on February 26, 2012 at 4:34
Take Action!
Clicking here will automatically add your name to this petition to Transcanada CEO Russ Girling:
"It is unconscionable that TransCanada is trying to confiscate land...
Automatically add your name:
Take action now!

Learn more about this campaign

CREDO Action | more than a network, a movement.

Tell TransCanada: Stop seizing land for the rejected Keystone XL pipeline!

The arrogance of TransCanada is shocking, even for an oil company.

The company is threatening to seize the property of American landowners and start construction of its Keystone XL pipeline — even though President Obama last month rejected the permit to build.

Tell TransCanada: Stop using eminent domain to confiscate private p...

The pipeline path includes the 600 acre working farm that Julia Trigg Crawford's grandfather bought in 1948, on the Texas Oklahoma border, where the Red River meets Bois d'Arc Creek, which waters the farm.

Fearing for the safety of her farm and it's water source, Julia Trigg rejected TransCanada's offer to buy an easement on her land.

TransCanada announced it was seizing her land under eminent domain and would begin digging, but Julia won a temporary restraining order,1 at least until this Friday when the court will hear the case challenging Transcanada's status as a "common carrier" under Texas law.

It's bad enough that TransCanada expect landowners like Julia Trigg to accept permanent damage to their land and possible oil spills. But it's beyond arrogant for this foreign oil company to trample on private property rights and start construction on a project whose permit has just been denied!

Tell TransCanada: Stop using eminent domain to confiscate private p...

Under eminent domain, the government can force landowners to accept monetary payment for the use of their land for certain public-good projects like highways and railroads.

Of course, TransCanada's massive fuse to the carbon bomb of the tar sands shouldn't qualify as one of these projects — it does great harm and only helps the profits of a foreign corporation. But regardless, the company doesn't even have the permit to build it, because the White House just rejected their application. But that hasn't stopped TransCanada.

According to The New York Times, the company has at least 34 eminent domain actions against landowners in Texas, and 22 in South Dakota.2 And their threats to landowners in Nebraska3helped spark massive public opposition and a special legislative session that were key in the decision to consider a different route.

Many of these landowners are being sued by the company, and told that if they don't take the small monetary offering — sometimes less than $10,000 in exchange for the permanent damage to their land, and huge risk of spills — their land will be condemned and TransCanada will seize the easement.

Julia Trigg and others are fighting back and doing everything they can to oppose TransCanada's land grab.

Everyone from environmentalists to Tea Partiers in Texas are showing their support for Americans' property rights.4As these court challenges unfold, we need to build pressure against TransCanada and spread the word about their reprehensible tactics.

Click below to automatically sign the petition:

Elijah Zarlin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets

1. "Keystone XL Pipeline: Texas Farmer Wins Temporary Restraining Order Against TransCanada," Huffington Post, February 14, 2012
2. "Eminent Domain Fight Has a Canadian Twist," New York Times, October 17th, 2011
3. "TransCanada Keystone XL Eminent Domain Threat Letter ," Dirty Oil Sands
4. "Texans rally against Keystone XL oil pipeline easement," LA Times, February 17, 2012

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 26, 2012 at 4:31
***forward widely***

No Power Greater: Marxism & the Working Class

Thursday, March 1, 7pm
1831 S. Racine AveChicago, IL 60608

The Occupy Movement has brought class politics to the front and center of the national discussion about what is wrong with society, and how it can be changed. What do Marxists say about class? Who is in the working class, and why does it matter? Do unions still matter? How can workers organize today? 

Shaun Harkin, socialists and veteran activist, will give a presentation that aims to answer the questions above. Join the Pilsen branch of the International Socialist Organization for a presentation and a discussion. 

Invite yourself and others to the Facebook page.
Or, take some time and read up on the topic. Here are some suggested readings:

For more information:
Legacy of a revolutionary: Malcolm X

Saturday, March 10, 2012
4:00pm until 6:00pm

Columbia College Chicago • Hokin Hall, room 109 • 623 S. Wabash Ave

Author of Black Liberation and Socialism, and editor of International Socialist Review, Ahmed Shawki will present on the legacy of one of the most well-known revolutionaries in the United States. Join the International Socialist Organization in a discussion and public forum on the well-known, yet misunderstood history of Malcolm X. 

Prepare for this discussion by listening to this talk on Malcolm X, given by NYC teacher and socialist, Brian Jones: http://wearemany.org/v/2011/07/malcolm-x

Or, check out this interview with Manning Marable: http://www.isreview.org/issues/63/feat-malcolmx.shtml

For more information about meetings hosted by the International Socialist Organization, check out:
Comment by Joe Balkis on February 23, 2012 at 6:42
Matteo Parlati stood up to the fascists.  Now, he needs us to stand up for him.
Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Matteo Parlati stood up to the fascists. Now, he needs us to stand up for him.
Matteo Parlati.Matteo Parlati is a shop steward who works for Ferrari Auto in Italy.  

He's an activist in FIOM-CGIL, the Italian metal workers union.  
Last October, when local neo-fascists decided to celebrate Mussolini's infamous March on Rome, Matteo and his colleagues staged a counter-demonstration which was attacked by police.  

He was then charged with resisting the police and bearing 'moral responsibility' for the clash.  

(Photos and videos confirm that Matteo was the victim, not the criminal.)  
Matteo's fellow shop stewards have unanimously called for an international protest campaign demanding that the charges against him be dropped.  
What Matteo did was resist fascism -- this is a basic responsibility of all trade unionists and is not a crime.
Please take a moment and send off your message of protest today - and spread the word!
Thank you.

Eric Lee
Copyright © 2012 LabourStart, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this message because you opted in at our website (http://www.labourstart.org) - most likely when you signed up to support one of our online campaigns in support of workers' rights.
Our mailing address is:
4 Alexandra Park Road
London, England N10 2AA

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 22, 2012 at 17:15


Coalition for Clean and Safe Ports

Imagine being subjected to daily doses of scare tactics and veiled threats about job security and loyalty to your boss. Or being forced against your will into a weekly mandatory meeting where you are divided into random groups and forced to watch anti-union videos. And this happens despite the fact that you’ve signed your name to several petitions demanding union representation.

Tell the Bosses at Toll to Stop the Union-Busting and Agree to a Fa...

“We couldn’t be more certain about our decision to form a union,” said Julio Ortega a truck driver at Toll Group. “All we want is to exercise our right to vote. Instead we are forced to waste our time in anti-union captive audience meetings. That’s time that I could be on the road doing my job, or – even better – at home with my family.”

Nearly a month has passed since truck drivers at Toll demanded a fast and fair election, but under the direction of their union-busting boss the company has used every tactic in the book to detour truck drivers and delay the vote.

Just the other week Toll used a hearing at the National Labor Relations Board to delay a union vote and to try to stuff the bargaining unit with non-driver staff in an attempt to dilute the current yes votes.

Tell the Bosses at Toll to Stop the Union-Busting and Agree to a Fa...


The Coalition for Clean and Safe Ports is an unprecedented alliance that is united against pollution and poverty at our nation's ports. You're receiving this message because you asked to receive updates from us.

Learn more about the coalition: visit our Web site

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 22, 2012 at 17:14

Join the conversation:
National Conference Call Tonight, Wednesday, Feb 22nd, 5:30pm PT/6:30pm MT/7:30pm CT/8:30pm ET
Register here!

Read our
International Women's Day
Call to Action

and Create an Action with your local Occupy!

Show your support
with an “I Heart the 99%” tee

Connect with us on twitter at @womenows


February 22, 2012

What do Women Occupy, CODEPINK, Rainforest Action Network, and Public Citizen have in common? We all have national, women-led campaigns targeting Bank of America, and we’re all teaming up to go after the B of A behemoth on March 8th, International Women’s Day!

Will you join us on March 8th to occupy a Bank of America in your town?

Of all the big banks, Bank of America leads the pack in home foreclosure, predatory lending, and irresponsible economic and environmental policies that are destroying our families and communities.

Find out more, get tools for your action (like how to become a Super Shero, how to set up a Really Really Free Market, and more), and check out our calendar to find or post an event in your area!

On last week’s Women Occupy conference call we were honored to have Amanda Starbuck, Director of Rainforest Action Network’s Energy and Finance Program, join us to discuss strategy and talking points. Tonight, the amazing Lisa Fithian will give a brief training in direct action and share some of her over 20 years of activist wisdom!

Register for tonight’s call with Lisa Fithian at 5:30pm Pacific / 8:30pm Eastern!

And stay tuned next week -- same time, same call -- when we will be joined by media strategist Celia Alario for a crash course in press skills and how to market your event!

Women Occupy

Comment by Joe Balkis on February 22, 2012 at 6:20
Social Security has not added one cent to our national debt and the majority of Americans oppose reducing the federal deficit by cutting cost-of-living increases. If you believe that Congress should never put Social Security benefits on the chopping block, please stand with the National Committee to Preserve Social Securit...

Don Hazen
Executive Editor, AlterNet

National Committee logo National Committee logo
National Committee logo
Social Security Cost-of-Living Adjustments Aren’t Accurate for Seniors
Join Now
Join Now
We need your help to send a nonpartisan message to Congress that COLA calculations must change!
70% of Americans across parties are against any cuts in Social Security. Thanks to the support of concerned citizens like you, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare recently waged a successful Hands Off — No Cuts grassroots campaign. We put a stop to proposed cuts that would have been harmful to older Americans. Working together, we proved the silent majority can make a difference.
The fight is not over! Yes, we stopped back-door benefits cuts, but seniors are still facing devastating reductions unless we change the way COLA calculations are made. The annual COLA was intended to offset rising costs due to inflation, and ensure that Social Security beneficiaries can keep up.
We must save critical benefits. The current basis for determining the COLA is the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which fails to reflect the rapidly rising health care costs faced by our elder population. These costs are increasing at a much faster pace than general inflation, diminishing retiree’s Social Security benefits the longer they live.
Join the fight to protect our oldest citizens from poverty! The National Committee believes that, to be fair to seniors, the COLA should be based on the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E). The CPI-E’s formula is a better measure of the real-world costs of living on a fixed income.
We need YOUR Support NOW!
Please let Washington know you support the CPI-E formula by joining the National Committee in its efforts today.
The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare is not affiliated with any political party or any branch of government.
Share this article: Twitter LinkedIn
  National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare
10 G Street, NE, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20002


© 2012 Independent Media Institute
All Rights Reserved
101 Spear St Suite 203
San Francisco, CA 94105


Members (75)


© 2014   Created by Eric Lee.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service